Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 October 22

< October 21	October 23 >

October 22

File:Window-well-cover-example.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No indication of Creative Commons license at source website. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:11, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced both uses with a free file. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:17, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 06:54, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kevin Kamenetz.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable with free images. Both File:Kevin Kamenetz (27993611774).jpg and File:County Executive Kevin Kamenetz (13466862545) (1).jpg are available under free licenses. SecretName101 (talk) 02:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The uploader of this file passed away about a month ago. If there's a free equivalent now available for this file per WP:FREER, then there's no longer a need for a non-free one and it should be deleted. In a case like this, though, a FFD discussion isn't really needed and the non-free can be tagged for speedy deletion per WP:F7 unless there are significant doubts about the freeness of the new file. Those concerns, however, will need to be raised on Commons since issues with Commons files need to be resolved on Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:04, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete --evrik ^(talk) 15:08, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have tagged the file for dated speedy deletion. I didn't want to spam a deceased uploader's talk page with deletion notifications, so I didn't notify the uploader. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete free alternative images exists, so fails WP:NFCC#1. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Halyna Hutchins (cinematographer, journalist, born 1979).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 8. FASTILY 05:07, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Halyna Hutchins (cinematographer, journalist, born 1979).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chanderi Saree.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No indication of CC0 license at source website. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:22, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete website says "© 2016 Artsy India Arts & Crafts LLP. All rights reserved". If the uploader is from that website, they would need to use OTRS. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:01, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Floridatrip pictures 078.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama for 3D artworks in the United States. Only used on the user page of an editor with few contributions. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:27, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, questionable licensing and no obvious reason why the file is useful if converted to non-free. Salavat (talk) 06:58, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Frank Ocean Voodoo.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 8. FASTILY 05:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frank Ocean Voodoo.ogg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Damaged Goods - Gang of Four.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep in Damaged Goods (song), remove from Post-punk -FASTILY 05:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Currently used at post-punk#United Kingdom. I'm unsure whether the usage complies with WP:NFCC#8. The song is briefly mentioned outside the caption, which to me doesn't improve justification of using the sample. Furthermore, even when used at the song article, I don't know whether the critical commentary of Damaged Goods (song) is sufficient enough to help the sample comply with the criterion. Also, the sample is nine seconds longer than what MOS:SAMPLE allows based on the song's length. Nonetheless, fixing the sample's issues with WP:NFCC#3b still wouldn't help the sample comply with the other criterion. George Ho (talk) 21:02, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep – The caption includes critical commentary about the sample's musical content and the fact that "Damaged Goods" is considered the first post-punk song. It would also be appropriate for inclusion on Damaged Goods (song) because, uh, the entire article is about it? Sample should be trimmed, but not deleted. ili (talk) 00:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Which segment of the song please? ~~I want to upload a newer version that lasts 21 seconds or less.~~ George Ho (talk) 02:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC); updated, 04:21, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I trimmed out the last nine or ten seconds, just in case. I'm unsure whether the segment is right for critical commentary. The sample came from a part of the final third of the song, to which I recently listened on YouTube and Spotify. George Ho (talk) 04:21, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is enough critical commentary in the article to pass WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 23:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Which article(s)? --George Ho (talk) 17:42, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For the song article. Aspects (talk) 21:51, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm not an expert on copyright rules but I can testify that this song has cultural significance. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:10, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To which articles does the sample belong? --George Ho (talk) 02:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Faith No More – I Started a Joke (CD1).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 8. FASTILY 05:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Faith No More – I Started a Joke (CD1).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.